Best Known (97−44, 97, s)-Nets in Base 8
(97−44, 97, 208)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (53, 97, 208)-net over F8, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (53, 100, 208)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 50, 104)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 103)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 103)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 50, 104)-net over F64, using
(97−44, 97, 258)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (53, 97, 258)-net over F8, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (53, 98, 258)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (4, 49, 129)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 128)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 4 and N(F) ≥ 129, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 128)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (4, 49, 129)-net over F64, using
(97−44, 97, 12390)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (53, 97, 12391)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 3983 277176 479632 165113 885200 615622 085188 635923 533637 591571 928992 091590 987181 815459 590602 > 897 [i]