Best Known (35, 35+47, s)-Nets in Base 8
(35, 35+47, 69)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (35, 82, 69)-net over F8, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (3, 26, 24)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 23)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 24, using
- the Klein quartic over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 24, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 23)-sequence over F8, using
- digital (9, 56, 45)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 44)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 45, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 44)-sequence over F8, using
- digital (3, 26, 24)-net over F8, using
(35, 35+47, 112)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (35, 82, 112)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (35, 111)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 35 and N(F) ≥ 112, using
(35, 35+47, 2026)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (35, 82, 2027)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (35, 81, 2027)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 14 203536 048275 945060 170944 583071 887579 400508 514877 892160 641401 663037 992496 > 881 [i]