Best Known (55, 55+47, s)-Nets in Base 8
(55, 55+47, 208)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (55, 102, 208)-net over F8, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (55, 104, 208)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 52, 104)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 103)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 103)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 52, 104)-net over F64, using
(55, 55+47, 258)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (55, 102, 258)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (4, 51, 129)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 128)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 4 and N(F) ≥ 129, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 128)-sequence over F64, using
(55, 55+47, 12433)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (55, 102, 12434)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (55, 101, 12434)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 16 303318 420483 842950 437153 895778 210567 140396 689845 170447 188526 291624 576312 200220 386321 919040 > 8101 [i]