Best Known (88, 88+50, s)-Nets in Base 8
(88, 88+50, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (88, 138, 354)-net over F8, using
- 24 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (88, 162, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 81, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 81, 177)-net over F64, using
(88, 88+50, 576)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(88, 138, 576)-net in base 8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (19, 69, 288)-net in base 64, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (19, 70, 288)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 60, 288)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 288, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 60, 288)-net over F128, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (19, 70, 288)-net in base 64, using
(88, 88+50, 979)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (88, 138, 979)-net over F8, using
(88, 88+50, 140454)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (88, 138, 140455)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 42309 608643 765496 766543 075080 930736 669238 106875 007901 115172 105560 402574 901768 856196 007234 344018 774796 688696 458065 337204 024744 > 8138 [i]