Best Known (165−51, 165, s)-Nets in Base 8
(165−51, 165, 1026)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (114, 165, 1026)-net over F8, using
- 7 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (114, 172, 1026)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 86, 513)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- the Hermitian function field over F64 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 86, 513)-net over F64, using
(165−51, 165, 2684)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (114, 165, 2684)-net over F8, using
(165−51, 165, 1221216)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (114, 165, 1221217)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (114, 164, 1221217)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 12786 885950 922036 844349 667876 624184 622517 081438 575493 620307 217657 814955 824213 664439 357591 350972 835546 272407 161921 287695 552487 531242 182472 557569 089024 > 8164 [i]