Best Known (69, 69+51, s)-Nets in Base 8
(69, 69+51, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (69, 120, 354)-net over F8, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (69, 124, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 62, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 62, 177)-net over F64, using
(69, 69+51, 418)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (69, 120, 418)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (9, 60, 209)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 208)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 209, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 208)-sequence over F64, using
(69, 69+51, 28906)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (69, 120, 28907)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (69, 119, 28907)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 293580 297401 936277 307038 124171 365589 626256 714329 604428 793768 806919 123491 208258 670823 057193 424195 771845 887780 > 8119 [i]