Best Known (169−53, 169, s)-Nets in Base 8
(169−53, 169, 1026)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (116, 169, 1026)-net over F8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (114, 169, 1026)-net over F8, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (114, 172, 1026)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 86, 513)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- the Hermitian function field over F64 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 86, 513)-net over F64, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (114, 172, 1026)-net over F8, using
(169−53, 169, 2514)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (116, 169, 2514)-net over F8, using
(169−53, 169, 1031665)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (116, 169, 1031666)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (116, 168, 1031666)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 52 375061 464346 909224 413109 505020 890693 049067 743965 562960 412901 797291 992806 993780 380111 667812 024560 196575 020921 318718 728723 781652 321155 498577 108186 800240 > 8168 [i]