Best Known (26, 26+57, s)-Nets in Base 8
(26, 26+57, 65)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (26, 83, 65)-net over F8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (14, 83, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
(26, 26+57, 86)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (26, 83, 86)-net over F8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (25, 83, 86)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (25, 85)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 25 and N(F) ≥ 86, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (25, 85)-sequence over F8, using
(26, 26+57, 694)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (26, 83, 695)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (26, 82, 695)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 113 329471 834481 169181 262763 683984 322809 952513 338744 690306 848299 652397 926812 > 882 [i]