Best Known (100, 100+58, s)-Nets in Base 8
(100, 100+58, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (100, 158, 354)-net over F8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (93, 158, 354)-net over F8, using
- 14 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (93, 172, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 86, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 86, 177)-net over F64, using
- 14 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (93, 172, 354)-net over F8, using
(100, 100+58, 576)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(100, 158, 576)-net in base 8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (21, 79, 288)-net in base 64, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on (21, 84, 288)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 72, 288)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 288, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 72, 288)-net over F128, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on (21, 84, 288)-net in base 64, using
(100, 100+58, 1024)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (100, 158, 1024)-net over F8, using
(100, 100+58, 138755)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (100, 158, 138756)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 48781 182944 422753 450363 143840 484719 336994 899876 978037 645300 433836 318223 131433 434321 396383 812005 191901 641310 712872 740579 854447 338894 827058 560128 > 8158 [i]