Best Known (162−59, 162, s)-Nets in Base 8
(162−59, 162, 368)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (103, 162, 368)-net over F8, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (1, 30, 14)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 13)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 14, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 13)-sequence over F8, using
- digital (73, 132, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 66, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 66, 177)-net over F64, using
- digital (1, 30, 14)-net over F8, using
(162−59, 162, 576)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(103, 162, 576)-net in base 8, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on (103, 164, 576)-net in base 8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (21, 82, 288)-net in base 64, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on (21, 84, 288)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 72, 288)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 288, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 72, 288)-net over F128, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on (21, 84, 288)-net in base 64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (21, 82, 288)-net in base 64, using
(162−59, 162, 1089)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (103, 162, 1089)-net over F8, using
(162−59, 162, 172061)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (103, 162, 172062)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (103, 161, 172062)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 24 974469 787555 413882 967384 345867 293048 194699 852687 042065 869670 275318 540857 898103 268317 555055 343498 528867 879439 138926 138139 258901 405581 881401 185199 > 8161 [i]