Best Known (104, 104+59, s)-Nets in Base 8
(104, 104+59, 371)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (104, 163, 371)-net over F8, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (2, 31, 17)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 16)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 17, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 16)-sequence over F8, using
- digital (73, 132, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 66, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 66, 177)-net over F64, using
- digital (2, 31, 17)-net over F8, using
(104, 104+59, 576)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(104, 163, 576)-net in base 8, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on (104, 166, 576)-net in base 8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (21, 83, 288)-net in base 64, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (21, 84, 288)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 72, 288)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 288, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 72, 288)-net over F128, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (21, 84, 288)-net in base 64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (21, 83, 288)-net in base 64, using
(104, 104+59, 1131)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (104, 163, 1131)-net over F8, using
(104, 104+59, 184854)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (104, 163, 184855)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (104, 162, 184855)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 199 822877 317141 209267 901869 185211 650623 335352 025401 348700 364726 064509 969268 753021 330906 960060 608711 021277 897524 148410 817063 656915 277252 993008 876416 > 8162 [i]