Best Known (168−62, 168, s)-Nets in Base 8
(168−62, 168, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (106, 168, 354)-net over F8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (93, 168, 354)-net over F8, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (93, 172, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 86, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 86, 177)-net over F64, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (93, 172, 354)-net over F8, using
(168−62, 168, 576)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(106, 168, 576)-net in base 8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on (105, 168, 576)-net in base 8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (21, 84, 288)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 72, 288)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 288, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 72, 288)-net over F128, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (21, 84, 288)-net in base 64, using
(168−62, 168, 1048)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (106, 168, 1048)-net over F8, using
(168−62, 168, 139007)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (106, 168, 139008)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 52 376031 252565 020606 713073 560208 026805 868141 560984 161066 219189 406383 760526 368960 707536 059592 286984 890951 247401 715206 231619 199884 125800 159468 894997 113745 > 8168 [i]