Best Known (105−63, 105, s)-Nets in Base 8
(105−63, 105, 98)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (42, 105, 98)-net over F8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (37, 105, 98)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (37, 97)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 37 and N(F) ≥ 98, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (37, 97)-sequence over F8, using
(105−63, 105, 129)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (42, 105, 129)-net over F8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (38, 105, 129)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (38, 128)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 38 and N(F) ≥ 129, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (38, 128)-sequence over F8, using
(105−63, 105, 1880)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (42, 105, 1881)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (42, 104, 1881)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 8452 501522 048291 072972 820343 919711 992370 913860 446037 997713 431014 520356 162232 892525 645188 105920 > 8104 [i]