Best Known (94, 94+64, s)-Nets in Base 8
(94, 94+64, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (94, 158, 354)-net over F8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (93, 158, 354)-net over F8, using
- 14 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (93, 172, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 86, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 86, 177)-net over F64, using
- 14 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (93, 172, 354)-net over F8, using
(94, 94+64, 384)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(94, 158, 384)-net in base 8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (15, 79, 192)-net in base 64, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on (15, 84, 192)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (3, 72, 192)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 191)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 192, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 191)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (3, 72, 192)-net over F128, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on (15, 84, 192)-net in base 64, using
(94, 94+64, 630)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (94, 158, 630)-net over F8, using
(94, 94+64, 52556)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (94, 158, 52557)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 48803 329999 597929 289349 772502 650708 112952 592280 151503 588415 990638 738879 461220 438615 402759 661783 890747 739629 418596 602652 783920 939156 784637 133270 > 8158 [i]