MinT - Best Known (103, 103+65, s)-Nets in Base 8

Best Known (103, 103+65, s)-Nets in Base 8

(103, 103+65, 354)-Net over F₈ — Constructive and digital

Digital (103, 168, 354)-net over F₈, using

t-expansion [i] based on digital (93, 168, 354)-net over F₈, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (93, 172, 354)-net over F₈, using
  - trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 86, 177)-net over F₆₄, using
    - net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F₆₄, using
      - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₆₄ with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
        a function field by GarcÃa and Quoos [i]

(103, 103+65, 432)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive

(103, 168, 432)-net in base 8, using

t-expansion [i] based on (101, 168, 432)-net in base 8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (17, 84, 216)-net in base 64, using
  - base change [i] based on digital (5, 72, 216)-net over F₁₂₈, using
    - net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F₁₂₈, using
      - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₁₂₈ with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 216, using
        a function field by SÃ©mirat [i]

(103, 103+65, 826)-Net over F₈ — Digital

Digital (103, 168, 826)-net over F₈, using

Gilbertâ€“VarÅ¡amov bound [i]

(103, 103+65, 94338)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s

There is no (103, 168, 94339)-net in base 8, because

1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (103, 167, 94339)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8^mÂ â‰¥ 6 547001 038497 678633 067594 660541 021861 598838 970451 840251 501081 196995 677833 757781 055891 765691 457204 316012 982015 663675 755014 015885 314397 138717 283869 679836 > 8¹⁶⁷ [i]