Best Known (81−68, 81, s)-Nets in Base 8
(81−68, 81, 48)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (13, 81, 48)-net over F8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (11, 81, 48)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 47)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 48, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 47)-sequence over F8, using
(81−68, 81, 56)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (13, 81, 56)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 55)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
(81−68, 81, 241)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (13, 81, 242)-net in base 8, because
- 17 times m-reduction [i] would yield (13, 64, 242)-net in base 8, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(864, 242, S8, 51), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 70 232740 660466 146387 371112 364270 550714 612400 798807 017251 810317 649288 784222 788532 961057 620751 780826 891846 178327 052743 502456 032729 337117 589164 303319 040000 / 10982 962511 522080 424097 485508 217442 568541 585265 006918 081487 297620 694440 959423 507493 470379 310181 > 864 [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(864, 242, S8, 51), but