Best Known (104, 104+68, s)-Nets in Base 8
(104, 104+68, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (104, 172, 354)-net over F8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (93, 172, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 86, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 86, 177)-net over F64, using
(104, 104+68, 432)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(104, 172, 432)-net in base 8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (18, 86, 216)-net in base 64, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on (18, 91, 216)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 78, 216)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 216, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 78, 216)-net over F128, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on (18, 91, 216)-net in base 64, using
(104, 104+68, 759)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (104, 172, 759)-net over F8, using
(104, 104+68, 71584)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (104, 172, 71585)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 214546 820619 420194 019888 244767 793934 035531 236816 210534 319459 989367 810429 147721 359682 620230 498530 242665 011102 197215 761940 563200 760189 927852 288808 361291 797120 > 8172 [i]