Best Known (158−69, 158, s)-Nets in Base 8
(158−69, 158, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (89, 158, 354)-net over F8, using
- 6 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (89, 164, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 82, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 82, 177)-net over F64, using
(158−69, 158, 450)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (89, 158, 450)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (10, 79, 225)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 224)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 225, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 224)-sequence over F64, using
(158−69, 158, 28589)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (89, 158, 28590)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (89, 157, 28590)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 6102 022797 189013 758824 323610 549401 913643 898616 922374 620240 847913 512264 166262 004303 960969 815330 321481 529014 756061 020594 642417 555912 619512 456078 > 8157 [i]