Best Known (57, 57+69, s)-Nets in Base 8
(57, 57+69, 110)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (57, 126, 110)-net over F8, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (9, 43, 45)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 44)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 45, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 44)-sequence over F8, using
- digital (14, 83, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- digital (9, 43, 45)-net over F8, using
(57, 57+69, 146)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (57, 126, 146)-net over F8, using
(57, 57+69, 4020)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (57, 126, 4021)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (57, 125, 4021)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 77378 789288 813148 141891 783037 283879 074363 787414 632364 248485 857953 787934 182495 846960 756358 044009 522083 027177 206618 > 8125 [i]