Best Known (59, 59+69, s)-Nets in Base 8
(59, 59+69, 113)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (59, 128, 113)-net over F8, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (11, 45, 48)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 47)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 48, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 47)-sequence over F8, using
- digital (14, 83, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- digital (11, 45, 48)-net over F8, using
(59, 59+69, 158)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (59, 128, 158)-net over F8, using
(59, 59+69, 4546)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (59, 128, 4547)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (59, 127, 4547)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 4 953495 231997 864346 915577 989583 093891 443563 129864 888281 186008 909252 389617 352957 973766 945386 761173 916112 110467 696570 > 8127 [i]