Best Known (96, 96+72, s)-Nets in Base 8
(96, 96+72, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (96, 168, 354)-net over F8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (93, 168, 354)-net over F8, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (93, 172, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 86, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 86, 177)-net over F64, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (93, 172, 354)-net over F8, using
(96, 96+72, 514)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (96, 168, 514)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (12, 84, 257)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (12, 256)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 12 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (12, 256)-sequence over F64, using
(96, 96+72, 33401)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (96, 168, 33402)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 52 407810 495354 203843 651288 913470 488211 543674 860557 578599 522258 432353 973219 568241 771365 700718 812840 998736 976446 759656 283032 332205 190177 187307 140899 417250 > 8168 [i]