Best Known (83, 83+75, s)-Nets in Base 8
(83, 83+75, 208)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (83, 158, 208)-net over F8, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (83, 160, 208)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 80, 104)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 103)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 103)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 80, 104)-net over F64, using
(83, 83+75, 225)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(83, 158, 225)-net in base 8, using
- 14 times m-reduction [i] based on (83, 172, 225)-net in base 8, using
- base change [i] based on digital (40, 129, 225)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 224)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 40 and N(F) ≥ 225, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 224)-sequence over F16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (40, 129, 225)-net over F16, using
(83, 83+75, 316)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (83, 158, 316)-net over F8, using
(83, 83+75, 14194)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (83, 158, 14195)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (83, 157, 14195)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 6098 530695 640565 220279 549575 400067 714729 886204 911200 711869 571141 961518 364600 074036 066369 274886 111053 790685 976787 959828 060809 657011 797565 087304 > 8157 [i]