Best Known (92, 92+79, s)-Nets in Base 8
(92, 92+79, 256)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (92, 171, 256)-net over F8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (91, 171, 256)-net over F8, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (91, 172, 256)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (5, 86, 128)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 127)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 127)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (5, 86, 128)-net over F64, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (91, 172, 256)-net over F8, using
(92, 92+79, 380)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (92, 171, 380)-net over F8, using
(92, 92+79, 18980)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (92, 171, 18981)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (92, 170, 18981)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 3354 178616 230148 848802 480790 487431 016327 434518 073377 454565 834376 840844 324791 519380 857549 393009 193054 641944 736033 930963 483794 525382 321229 871177 272358 736896 > 8170 [i]