MinT - Best Known (33, 33+8, s)-Nets in Base 8

Best Known (33, 33+8, s)-Nets in Base 8

(33, 33+8, 8320)-Net over F₈ — Constructive and digital

Digital (33, 41, 8320)-net over F₈, using

8¹ times duplication [i] based on digital (32, 40, 8320)-net over F₈, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (12, 20, 4160)-net over F₆₄, using
  - generalized (u,Â u+v)-construction [i] based on
    1. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄, using
      - s-reduction based on digital (0, 0, s)-net over F₆₄ with arbitrarily large s, using
        arbitrary set of 64⁰ points [i]
    2. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
    3. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
    4. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
    5. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
    6. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
    7. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
    8. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
    9. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
    10. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
    11. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
    12. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
    13. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
    14. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
    15. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
    16. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
    17. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
    18. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
    19. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
    20. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
    21. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
    22. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
    23. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
    24. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
    25. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
    26. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
    27. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
    28. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
    29. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
    30. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
    31. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
    32. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
    33. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
    34. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
    35. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
    36. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
    37. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
    38. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
    39. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
    40. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
    41. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
    42. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
    43. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
    44. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
    45. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
    46. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
    47. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
    48. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
    49. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
    50. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
    51. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
    52. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
    53. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
    54. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
    55. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
    56. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
    57. digital (0, 1, 65)-net over F₆₄, using
      - s-reduction based on digital (0, 1, s)-net over F₆₄ with arbitrarily large s, using
        construction for strength kÂ =Â 1 [i]
    58. digital (0, 1, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
    59. digital (0, 1, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
    60. digital (0, 1, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
    61. digital (0, 2, 65)-net over F₆₄, using
      - kÂ =Â 2 construction [i]
    62. digital (0, 2, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
    63. digital (0, 4, 65)-net over F₆₄, using
      - net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 64)-sequence over F₆₄, using
        generalized Faure sequence [i]
        Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₆₄ with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
        the rational function field F₆₄(x) [i]
        Niederreiter sequence [i]
    64. digital (0, 8, 65)-net over F₆₄, using
      - net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 64)-sequence over F₆₄ (see above)

(33, 33+8, 32769)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive

(33, 41, 32769)-net in base 8, using

8¹ times duplication [i] based on (32, 40, 32769)-net in base 8, using
- base change [i] based on digital (22, 30, 32769)-net over F₁₆, using
  - net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(16³⁰, 32769, F₁₆, 8, 8) (dual of [(32769, 8), 262122, 9]-NRT-code), using
    - OA 4-folding and stacking [i] based on linear OA(16³⁰, 131076, F₁₆, 8) (dual of [131076, 131046, 9]-code), using
      - trace code [i] based on linear OA(256¹⁵, 65538, F₂₅₆, 8) (dual of [65538, 65523, 9]-code), using
        constructionÂ X applied to C_e(7) âŠ‚ C_e(6) [i] based on
        linear OA(256¹⁵, 65536, F₂₅₆, 8) (dual of [65536, 65521, 9]-code), using an extension C_e(7) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 65535Â = 256²âˆ’1, defining interval IÂ =Â [1,7], and designed minimum distance dÂ â‰¥Â |I|+1Â =Â 8 [i]
        linear OA(256¹³, 65536, F₂₅₆, 7) (dual of [65536, 65523, 8]-code), using an extension C_e(6) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 65535Â = 256²âˆ’1, defining interval IÂ =Â [1,6], and designed minimum distance dÂ â‰¥Â |I|+1Â =Â 7 [i]
        linear OA(256⁰, 2, F₂₅₆, 0) (dual of [2, 2, 1]-code), using
        discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(256⁰, s, F₂₅₆, 0) (dual of [s, s, 1]-code) with arbitrarily large s, using
        OA with only one run / dual of code without redundancy [i]

(33, 33+8, 94051)-Net over F₈ — Digital

Digital (33, 41, 94051)-net over F₈, using

Gilbertâ€“VarÅ¡amov bound [i]

(33, 33+8, 131076)-Net in Base 8

(33, 41, 131076)-net in base 8, using

8¹ times duplication [i] based on (32, 40, 131076)-net in base 8, using
- base change [i] based on digital (22, 30, 131076)-net over F₁₆, using
  - embedding of OOA with Gilbertâ€“VarÅ¡amov bound [i] based on linear OA(16³⁰, 131076, F₁₆, 8) (dual of [131076, 131046, 9]-code), using
    - trace code [i] based on linear OA(256¹⁵, 65538, F₂₅₆, 8) (dual of [65538, 65523, 9]-code), using
      - constructionÂ X applied to C_e(7) âŠ‚ C_e(6) [i] based on
        linear OA(256¹⁵, 65536, F₂₅₆, 8) (dual of [65536, 65521, 9]-code), using an extension C_e(7) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 65535Â = 256²âˆ’1, defining interval IÂ =Â [1,7], and designed minimum distance dÂ â‰¥Â |I|+1Â =Â 8 [i]
        linear OA(256¹³, 65536, F₂₅₆, 7) (dual of [65536, 65523, 8]-code), using an extension C_e(6) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 65535Â = 256²âˆ’1, defining interval IÂ =Â [1,6], and designed minimum distance dÂ â‰¥Â |I|+1Â =Â 7 [i]
        linear OA(256⁰, 2, F₂₅₆, 0) (dual of [2, 2, 1]-code), using
        discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(256⁰, s, F₂₅₆, 0) (dual of [s, s, 1]-code) with arbitrarily large s, using
        OA with only one run / dual of code without redundancy [i]

(33, 33+8, large)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s

There is no (33, 41, large)-net in base 8, because

6 times m-reduction [i] would yield (33, 35, large)-net in base 8, but
- mutually orthogonal hypercube bound [i]