Best Known (83, 83+81, s)-Nets in Base 8
(83, 83+81, 160)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (83, 164, 160)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 82, 80)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 79)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 80, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 79)-sequence over F64, using
(83, 83+81, 225)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(83, 164, 225)-net in base 8, using
- 8 times m-reduction [i] based on (83, 172, 225)-net in base 8, using
- base change [i] based on digital (40, 129, 225)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 224)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 40 and N(F) ≥ 225, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 224)-sequence over F16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (40, 129, 225)-net over F16, using
(83, 83+81, 277)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (83, 164, 277)-net over F8, using
(83, 83+81, 10758)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (83, 164, 10759)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (83, 163, 10759)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 1598 777180 596707 773555 890364 823038 632263 010099 214309 854361 208213 806852 452345 011959 383209 188446 004422 130031 672050 195439 004390 915756 827374 467660 611648 > 8163 [i]