Best Known (90, 90+82, s)-Nets in Base 8
(90, 90+82, 208)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (90, 172, 208)-net over F8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (89, 172, 208)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 86, 104)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 103)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 103)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 86, 104)-net over F64, using
(90, 90+82, 225)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(90, 172, 225)-net in base 8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on (83, 172, 225)-net in base 8, using
- base change [i] based on digital (40, 129, 225)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 224)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 40 and N(F) ≥ 225, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 224)-sequence over F16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (40, 129, 225)-net over F16, using
(90, 90+82, 334)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (90, 172, 334)-net over F8, using
(90, 90+82, 14144)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (90, 172, 14145)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 214690 866231 933218 642741 682520 310219 371889 980486 043460 163543 234654 328014 521559 934067 513321 775095 642590 571368 838086 634180 748916 086929 056276 417213 550202 615680 > 8172 [i]