Best Known (172−83, 172, s)-Nets in Base 8
(172−83, 172, 208)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (89, 172, 208)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 86, 104)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 103)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 103)-sequence over F64, using
(172−83, 172, 225)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(89, 172, 225)-net in base 8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on (83, 172, 225)-net in base 8, using
- base change [i] based on digital (40, 129, 225)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 224)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 40 and N(F) ≥ 225, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 224)-sequence over F16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (40, 129, 225)-net over F16, using
(172−83, 172, 317)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (89, 172, 317)-net over F8, using
(172−83, 172, 13443)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (89, 172, 13444)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (89, 171, 13444)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 26819 662200 317660 913073 249926 414395 531798 571454 366263 089134 465480 346191 852085 434733 459779 272990 251216 247691 592912 997255 045082 948553 492645 532889 791604 462960 > 8171 [i]