Best Known (172−86, 172, s)-Nets in Base 8
(172−86, 172, 194)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (86, 172, 194)-net over F8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (85, 172, 194)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (85, 193)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 85 and N(F) ≥ 194, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (85, 193)-sequence over F8, using
(172−86, 172, 225)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(86, 172, 225)-net in base 8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on (83, 172, 225)-net in base 8, using
- base change [i] based on digital (40, 129, 225)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 224)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 40 and N(F) ≥ 225, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 224)-sequence over F16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (40, 129, 225)-net over F16, using
(172−86, 172, 274)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (86, 172, 274)-net over F8, using
(172−86, 172, 9852)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (86, 172, 9853)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 215201 256044 675359 977498 991177 044221 595543 264222 401166 982282 686044 630821 603398 204476 805290 590189 775001 587487 458315 730271 147882 482487 073370 903360 864464 958252 > 8172 [i]