Best Known (23, 23+89, s)-Nets in Base 8
(23, 23+89, 65)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (23, 112, 65)-net over F8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (14, 112, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
(23, 23+89, 76)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (23, 112, 76)-net over F8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (20, 112, 76)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (20, 75)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 20 and N(F) ≥ 76, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (20, 75)-sequence over F8, using
(23, 23+89, 440)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (23, 112, 441)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (23, 111, 441)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 18306 489769 836280 798093 941608 273818 527667 651545 983102 076515 205756 460553 085481 360515 299059 016390 623380 > 8111 [i]