Best Known (27−9, 27, s)-Nets in Base 8
(27−9, 27, 260)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (18, 27, 260)-net over F8, using
- 81 times duplication [i] based on digital (17, 26, 260)-net over F8, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (4, 8, 130)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 4, 65)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 64)-sequence over F64, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the rational function field F64(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 64)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 4, 65)-net over F64, using
- digital (9, 18, 130)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 9, 65)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 64)-sequence over F64 (see above)
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 9, 65)-net over F64, using
- digital (4, 8, 130)-net over F8, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(27−9, 27, 514)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(18, 27, 514)-net in base 8, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (18, 28, 514)-net in base 8, using
- base change [i] based on digital (11, 21, 514)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (11, 22, 514)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 11, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- the rational function field F256(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 11, 257)-net over F256, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (11, 22, 514)-net over F16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (11, 21, 514)-net over F16, using
(27−9, 27, 651)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (18, 27, 651)-net over F8, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(827, 651, F8, 9) (dual of [651, 624, 10]-code), using
- 134 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (2, 0, 0, 0, 1, 12 times 0, 1, 35 times 0, 1, 80 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(822, 512, F8, 9) (dual of [512, 490, 10]-code), using
- an extension Ce(8) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 511 = 83−1, defining interval I = [1,8], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 9 [i]
- 134 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (2, 0, 0, 0, 1, 12 times 0, 1, 35 times 0, 1, 80 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(822, 512, F8, 9) (dual of [512, 490, 10]-code), using
(27−9, 27, 234442)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (18, 27, 234443)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (18, 26, 234443)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 302235 411710 559255 721794 > 826 [i]