Best Known (13, 13+9, s)-Nets in Base 8
(13, 13+9, 160)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (13, 22, 160)-net over F8, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (13, 24, 160)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 12, 80)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 79)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 80, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 79)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 12, 80)-net over F64, using
(13, 13+9, 256)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (13, 22, 256)-net over F8, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(822, 256, F8, 2, 9) (dual of [(256, 2), 490, 10]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 2-folding [i] based on linear OA(822, 512, F8, 9) (dual of [512, 490, 10]-code), using
- an extension Ce(8) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 511 = 83−1, defining interval I = [1,8], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 9 [i]
- OOA 2-folding [i] based on linear OA(822, 512, F8, 9) (dual of [512, 490, 10]-code), using
(13, 13+9, 258)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(13, 22, 258)-net in base 8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (2, 11, 129)-net in base 64, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on (2, 14, 129)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (0, 12, 129)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 128)-sequence over F128, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 129, using
- the rational function field F128(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 128)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (0, 12, 129)-net over F128, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on (2, 14, 129)-net in base 64, using
(13, 13+9, 17423)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (13, 22, 17424)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (13, 21, 17424)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 9 225265 387800 002773 > 821 [i]