Best Known (129−93, 129, s)-Nets in Base 8
(129−93, 129, 65)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (36, 129, 65)-net over F8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (14, 129, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
(129−93, 129, 112)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (36, 129, 112)-net over F8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (35, 129, 112)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (35, 111)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 35 and N(F) ≥ 112, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (35, 111)-sequence over F8, using
(129−93, 129, 808)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (36, 129, 809)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (36, 128, 809)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 39 596416 456985 243816 541780 880624 514806 152327 975484 273601 693098 268676 053216 784815 954485 061371 993632 772585 182685 316736 > 8128 [i]