Best Known (64, 64+97, s)-Nets in Base 8
(64, 64+97, 98)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (64, 161, 98)-net over F8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (37, 161, 98)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (37, 97)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 37 and N(F) ≥ 98, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (37, 97)-sequence over F8, using
(64, 64+97, 144)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (64, 161, 144)-net over F8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (45, 161, 144)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 143)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 45 and N(F) ≥ 144, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 143)-sequence over F8, using
(64, 64+97, 2711)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (64, 161, 2712)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (64, 160, 2712)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 3 162109 379819 034427 392605 788872 163947 531036 993819 547624 722587 144830 290244 037492 935071 485415 368842 502197 972805 773483 459326 043631 741250 442868 827716 > 8160 [i]