Best Known (56, 104, s)-Nets in Base 8
(56, 104, 208)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (56, 104, 208)-net over F8, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (56, 106, 208)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 53, 104)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 103)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 103)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 53, 104)-net over F64, using
(56, 104, 258)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (56, 104, 258)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (4, 52, 129)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 128)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 4 and N(F) ≥ 129, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 128)-sequence over F64, using
(56, 104, 11457)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (56, 104, 11458)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 8352 659579 116215 292011 669889 564548 695869 758661 800058 685615 724607 588781 416550 478338 888826 169688 > 8104 [i]