Best Known (67, 104, s)-Nets in Base 8
(67, 104, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (67, 104, 354)-net over F8, using
- 16 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (67, 120, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 60, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 60, 177)-net over F64, using
(67, 104, 518)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(67, 104, 518)-net in base 8, using
- base change [i] based on digital (41, 78, 518)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 39, 259)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 258)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 39, 259)-net over F256, using
(67, 104, 847)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (67, 104, 847)-net over F8, using
(67, 104, 158738)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (67, 104, 158739)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (67, 103, 158739)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 1042 976244 505388 484880 666126 179345 981798 461713 295918 895804 305257 525145 949019 243423 611365 013265 > 8103 [i]