Best Known (67, 108, s)-Nets in Base 8
(67, 108, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (67, 108, 354)-net over F8, using
- 12 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (67, 120, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 60, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 60, 177)-net over F64, using
(67, 108, 432)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(67, 108, 432)-net in base 8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (13, 54, 216)-net in base 64, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on (13, 56, 216)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 48, 216)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 216, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 48, 216)-net over F128, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on (13, 56, 216)-net in base 64, using
(67, 108, 638)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (67, 108, 638)-net over F8, using
(67, 108, 80477)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (67, 108, 80478)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (67, 107, 80478)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 4 272806 321757 855782 321432 650247 378089 873188 480377 567595 117992 615474 356181 926683 115859 651664 121721 > 8107 [i]