Best Known (94, 108, s)-Nets in Base 8
(94, 108, 2396742)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (94, 108, 2396742)-net over F8, using
- 82 times duplication [i] based on digital (92, 106, 2396742)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (39, 53, 1198371)-net over F64, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(6453, 1198371, F64, 14, 14) (dual of [(1198371, 14), 16777141, 15]-NRT-code), using
- OA 7-folding and stacking [i] based on linear OA(6453, 8388597, F64, 14) (dual of [8388597, 8388544, 15]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6453, large, F64, 14) (dual of [large, large−53, 15]-code), using
- the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 16777215 = 644−1, defining interval I = [0,13], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 15 [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6453, large, F64, 14) (dual of [large, large−53, 15]-code), using
- OA 7-folding and stacking [i] based on linear OA(6453, 8388597, F64, 14) (dual of [8388597, 8388544, 15]-code), using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(6453, 1198371, F64, 14, 14) (dual of [(1198371, 14), 16777141, 15]-NRT-code), using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (39, 53, 1198371)-net over F64, using
(94, 108, large)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (94, 108, large)-net over F8, using
- 83 times duplication [i] based on digital (91, 105, large)-net over F8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (90, 105, large)-net over F8, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–VarÅ¡amov bound [i] based on linear OA(8105, large, F8, 15) (dual of [large, large−105, 16]-code), using
- the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 16777215 = 88−1, defining interval I = [0,14], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 16 [i]
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–VarÅ¡amov bound [i] based on linear OA(8105, large, F8, 15) (dual of [large, large−105, 16]-code), using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (90, 105, large)-net over F8, using
(94, 108, large)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (94, 108, large)-net in base 8, because
- 12 times m-reduction [i] would yield (94, 96, large)-net in base 8, but