Best Known (65, 112, s)-Nets in Base 8
(65, 112, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (65, 112, 354)-net over F8, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (65, 116, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 58, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 58, 177)-net over F64, using
(65, 112, 418)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (65, 112, 418)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (9, 56, 209)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 208)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 209, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 208)-sequence over F64, using
(65, 112, 30728)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (65, 112, 30729)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (65, 111, 30729)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 17499 123299 779111 920391 481649 220499 602494 196811 972585 367206 600395 058054 840980 095591 490000 437517 614080 > 8111 [i]