Best Known (80, 128, s)-Nets in Base 8
(80, 128, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (80, 128, 354)-net over F8, using
- 18 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (80, 146, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 73, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 73, 177)-net over F64, using
(80, 128, 514)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(80, 128, 514)-net in base 8, using
- base change [i] based on digital (48, 96, 514)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 48, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- the rational function field F256(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 48, 257)-net over F256, using
(80, 128, 775)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (80, 128, 775)-net over F8, using
(80, 128, 91764)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (80, 128, 91765)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 39 408724 027789 020696 105834 066836 620792 292360 110390 550665 950130 917850 490962 239336 476590 519694 060749 873663 668560 697244 > 8128 [i]