Best Known (94, 131, s)-Nets in Base 8
(94, 131, 1026)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (94, 131, 1026)-net over F8, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (94, 132, 1026)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 66, 513)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- the Hermitian function field over F64 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 66, 513)-net over F64, using
(94, 131, 4131)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (94, 131, 4131)-net over F8, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(8131, 4131, F8, 37) (dual of [4131, 4000, 38]-code), using
- 24 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (1, 23 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(8130, 4106, F8, 37) (dual of [4106, 3976, 38]-code), using
- construction X applied to C([0,18]) ⊂ C([0,17]) [i] based on
- linear OA(8129, 4097, F8, 37) (dual of [4097, 3968, 38]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 4097 | 88−1, defining interval I = [0,18], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−18,−17,…,18}|+1 = 38 (BCH-bound) [i]
- linear OA(8121, 4097, F8, 35) (dual of [4097, 3976, 36]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 4097 | 88−1, defining interval I = [0,17], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−17,−16,…,17}|+1 = 36 (BCH-bound) [i]
- linear OA(81, 9, F8, 1) (dual of [9, 8, 2]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(81, s, F8, 1) (dual of [s, s−1, 2]-code) with arbitrarily large s, using
- construction X applied to C([0,18]) ⊂ C([0,17]) [i] based on
- 24 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (1, 23 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(8130, 4106, F8, 37) (dual of [4106, 3976, 38]-code), using
(94, 131, 3592090)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (94, 131, 3592091)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (94, 130, 3592091)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 2521 736704 000728 056078 490839 130762 878487 051189 489301 320344 350245 041361 917513 010288 289190 304245 994220 910354 982402 481835 > 8130 [i]