Best Known (83, 140, s)-Nets in Base 8
(83, 140, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (83, 140, 354)-net over F8, using
- 12 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (83, 152, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 76, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 76, 177)-net over F64, using
(83, 140, 384)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(83, 140, 384)-net in base 8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (13, 70, 192)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (3, 60, 192)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 191)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 192, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 191)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (3, 60, 192)-net over F128, using
(83, 140, 556)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (83, 140, 556)-net over F8, using
(83, 140, 49085)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (83, 140, 49086)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (83, 139, 49086)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 338651 022225 516899 762880 610476 045505 424911 834651 513896 839643 040184 274742 650675 014657 369933 681669 704128 628913 895285 954747 247903 > 8139 [i]