Best Known (84, 141, s)-Nets in Base 8
(84, 141, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (84, 141, 354)-net over F8, using
- 13 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (84, 154, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 77, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 77, 177)-net over F64, using
(84, 141, 384)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(84, 141, 384)-net in base 8, using
- 81 times duplication [i] based on (83, 140, 384)-net in base 8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (13, 70, 192)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (3, 60, 192)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 191)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 192, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 191)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (3, 60, 192)-net over F128, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (13, 70, 192)-net in base 64, using
(84, 141, 578)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (84, 141, 578)-net over F8, using
(84, 141, 52870)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (84, 141, 52871)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (84, 140, 52871)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 2 708437 922562 869322 100463 764689 588395 283200 151189 322228 448106 233011 163957 953613 717072 449298 881708 988959 570576 593736 360734 778512 > 8140 [i]