Best Known (92, 148, s)-Nets in Base 8
(92, 148, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (92, 148, 354)-net over F8, using
- 22 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (92, 170, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 85, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 85, 177)-net over F64, using
(92, 148, 432)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(92, 148, 432)-net in base 8, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on (92, 152, 432)-net in base 8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (16, 76, 216)-net in base 64, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (16, 77, 216)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 66, 216)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 216, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 66, 216)-net over F128, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (16, 77, 216)-net in base 64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (16, 76, 216)-net in base 64, using
(92, 148, 831)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (92, 148, 831)-net over F8, using
(92, 148, 95786)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (92, 148, 95787)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 45 436996 470509 957182 298462 545436 719299 269293 363391 584714 487314 590705 899757 616789 287087 800380 939089 254899 119172 349475 443795 657316 691800 > 8148 [i]