Best Known (94, 148, s)-Nets in Base 8
(94, 148, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (94, 148, 354)-net over F8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (93, 148, 354)-net over F8, using
- 24 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (93, 172, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 86, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 86, 177)-net over F64, using
- 24 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (93, 172, 354)-net over F8, using
(94, 148, 576)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(94, 148, 576)-net in base 8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (20, 74, 288)-net in base 64, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on (20, 77, 288)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 66, 288)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 288, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 66, 288)-net over F128, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on (20, 77, 288)-net in base 64, using
(94, 148, 1003)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (94, 148, 1003)-net over F8, using
(94, 148, 139164)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (94, 148, 139165)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 45 435485 011399 462815 751576 080574 024230 065878 170104 679103 338082 234211 209344 327868 223629 328236 012732 531457 899911 450782 930077 930087 934420 > 8148 [i]