Best Known (93, 154, s)-Nets in Base 8
(93, 154, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (93, 154, 354)-net over F8, using
- 18 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (93, 172, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 86, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 86, 177)-net over F64, using
(93, 154, 432)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(93, 154, 432)-net in base 8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (16, 77, 216)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 66, 216)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 216, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 66, 216)-net over F128, using
(93, 154, 685)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (93, 154, 685)-net over F8, using
(93, 154, 69395)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (93, 154, 69396)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (93, 153, 69396)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 1 488814 026361 609772 600011 836033 249351 750284 571374 681207 666090 926542 162606 850476 486731 112566 853500 723073 404495 859488 351929 735912 693564 899648 > 8153 [i]