Best Known (97, 154, s)-Nets in Base 8
(97, 154, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (97, 154, 354)-net over F8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (93, 154, 354)-net over F8, using
- 18 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (93, 172, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 86, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 86, 177)-net over F64, using
- 18 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (93, 172, 354)-net over F8, using
(97, 154, 576)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(97, 154, 576)-net in base 8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (20, 77, 288)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 66, 288)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 288, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 66, 288)-net over F128, using
(97, 154, 961)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (97, 154, 961)-net over F8, using
(97, 154, 138865)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (97, 154, 138866)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (97, 153, 138866)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 1 488752 527705 303838 263538 973474 690776 187321 538711 550652 637455 227977 196119 197280 864316 031813 913945 854847 567510 236252 967524 577225 532526 574392 > 8153 [i]