Best Known (116, 158, s)-Nets in Base 8
(116, 158, 1026)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (116, 158, 1026)-net over F8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (114, 158, 1026)-net over F8, using
- 14 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (114, 172, 1026)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 86, 513)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- the Hermitian function field over F64 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 86, 513)-net over F64, using
- 14 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (114, 172, 1026)-net over F8, using
(116, 158, 6987)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (116, 158, 6987)-net over F8, using
(116, 158, 7728066)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (116, 158, 7728067)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 48777 408351 420097 177073 443254 976860 868721 643455 943450 566906 532966 539984 366067 351990 142977 191811 255199 325764 062349 871829 000189 870643 955885 736800 > 8158 [i]