Best Known (104, 159, s)-Nets in Base 8
(104, 159, 389)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (104, 159, 389)-net over F8, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (8, 35, 35)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 34)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F8 with g(F) = 7, N(F) = 34, and 1 place with degree 2 [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 34, using a function field by Sémirat [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 34)-sequence over F8, using
- digital (69, 124, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 62, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 62, 177)-net over F64, using
- digital (8, 35, 35)-net over F8, using
(104, 159, 576)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(104, 159, 576)-net in base 8, using
- 7 times m-reduction [i] based on (104, 166, 576)-net in base 8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (21, 83, 288)-net in base 64, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (21, 84, 288)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 72, 288)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 288, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 72, 288)-net over F128, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (21, 84, 288)-net in base 64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (21, 83, 288)-net in base 64, using
(104, 159, 1393)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (104, 159, 1393)-net over F8, using
(104, 159, 300630)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (104, 159, 300631)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (104, 158, 300631)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 48779 048317 056986 563933 502093 385997 712884 889129 376018 444785 404137 529918 638283 262643 735851 602049 443818 370641 737980 701795 915767 744254 362552 328992 > 8158 [i]