Best Known (100, 160, s)-Nets in Base 8
(100, 160, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (100, 160, 354)-net over F8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (93, 160, 354)-net over F8, using
- 12 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (93, 172, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 86, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 86, 177)-net over F64, using
- 12 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (93, 172, 354)-net over F8, using
(100, 160, 514)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(100, 160, 514)-net in base 8, using
- base change [i] based on digital (60, 120, 514)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 60, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- the rational function field F256(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 60, 257)-net over F256, using
(100, 160, 927)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (100, 160, 927)-net over F8, using
(100, 160, 112745)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (100, 160, 112746)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 3 122381 629642 763959 272534 992653 481127 608772 629851 716918 157329 007378 808914 477266 317562 841882 809422 316607 032858 769045 229635 675974 434125 538401 419056 > 8160 [i]