Best Known (89, 160, s)-Nets in Base 8
(89, 160, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (89, 160, 354)-net over F8, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (89, 164, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 82, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 82, 177)-net over F64, using
(89, 160, 424)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (89, 160, 424)-net over F8, using
(89, 160, 25141)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (89, 160, 25142)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (89, 159, 25142)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 390376 688151 718582 631487 925508 322576 826356 481296 765014 051935 617709 372028 498354 591830 125224 022264 439712 870054 416591 356384 904094 400856 682060 296866 > 8159 [i]